Skeletal and nonskeletal effects of vitamin D: is vitamin D a tonic for bone and other tissues?
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to evaluate the role of vitamin D in calcium homeostasis and the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for skeletal and nonskeletal health outcomes.
Results Summary
The study found that vitamin D primarily regulates intestinal calcium absorption to maintain calcium homeostasis, but excessive levels can increase bone resorption and impair mineralization. Clinical trial data did not support vitamin D supplementation for improving bone density or preventing falls/fractures, except in frail or vitamin D-deficient populations with baseline 25(OH)D levels ≤40 nmol/L.
Population
Frail and/or vitamin D-deficient populations with baseline 25(OH)D levels ≤40 nmol/L.
Effective Dosage
≤800 IU/day
Duration
Not specified
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vitamin D | increase | bone resorption | - | - | can increase | #1 |
vitamin D | decrease | mineralization | - | - | can impair | #2 |
vitamin D supplements | no change | bone density | - | - | fails to establish their efficacy | #3 |
vitamin D supplements | no change | prevention of falls | - | - | fails to establish their efficacy | #4 |
vitamin D supplements | no change | prevention of fractures | - | - | fails to establish their efficacy | #5 |
vitamin D supplements | increase | - | frail and/or vitamin D-deficient populations | - | have produced positive outcomes | #6 |
vitamin D supplementation | increase | skeletal outcomes | cohorts with baseline circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels in the range 25-40 nmol/L or lower | - | positive effects | #7 |
vitamin D supplementation | no change | nonskeletal conditions | - | - | little evidence for efficacy | #8 |
supplements | neutral | - | populations with risk factors (e.g., lifestyle, skin color, and frailty) for having serum 25(OH)D levels in the 25- to 40-nmol/L range or below | - | should be advised | #9 |
A dose of ≤800 IU/day | neutral | - | - | - | is adequate | #10 |
A dose of ≤800 IU/day | increase | 25(OH)D levels | - | well above the threshold for osteomalacia | will maintain | #11 |
The vitamin D endocrine system is critical for the maintenance of circulating calcium concentrations, but recently, there has been advocacy for the widespread use of vitamin D supplements to improve skeletal and nonskeletal health. Recent studies of tissue-selective vitamin D receptor knockout mice indicate that the principal action of vitamin D responsible for the maintenance of calcium homoeostasis is the regulation of intestinal calcium absorption. High levels of vitamin D can increase bone resorption and impair mineralization, consistent with its role in maintaining circulating calcium concentrations. These findings suggest that circumspection is appropriate in its clinical use. There is now substantial clinical trial data with vitamin D supplements, which fails to establish their efficacy on bone density or the prevention of falls or fractures. However, some trials in frail and/or vitamin D-deficient populations have produced positive outcomes. Where there are positive effects of vitamin D supplementation on skeletal outcomes, these are mainly seen in cohorts with baseline circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels in the range 25-40 nmol/L or lower. A great diversity of nonskeletal conditions have been associated with low 25(OH)D, but there is little evidence for efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for such end-points. At present, supplements should be advised for populations with risk factors (e.g., lifestyle, skin color, and frailty) for having serum 25(OH)D levels in the 25- to 40-nmol/L range or below. A dose of ≤800 IU/day is adequate. This approach will maintain 25(OH)D levels well above the threshold for osteomalacia and makes allowance for the poor accuracy and precision of some 25(OH)D assays.