Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

'High' risk? A systematic review of the acute outcomes of mixing alcohol with energy drinks.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)
October 1, 2014
Amy Peacock et al. (5 authors)
Journal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReviewSystematic ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine whether mixing alcohol with energy drinks (AmED) alters physiological, psychological, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes compared to alcohol alone.

Results Summary

The study found that AmED consumption increased stimulation-based effects and reduced sedation-based outcomes compared to alcohol alone, but experimental results were inconsistent with real-life reports. AmED consumers generally exhibited more hazardous drinking patterns and risk-taking behavior, though some studies showed lower odds of risk-taking.

Population

Not specified (general AmED consumers, based on literature review).

Effective Dosage

Not specified (low doses in experimental studies vs. typical self-reported real-life intake).

Duration

Not specified (cross-sectional and experimental studies reviewed).

Interactions

Alcohol (primary interaction studied).

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
co-consumption of energy drinks and alcohol (AmED)
increase
stimulation-based outcomes
AmED consumers
-
increased odds of self-reported stimulation-based outcomes
#1
co-consumption of energy drinks and alcohol (AmED)
decrease
sedation-based physiological outcomes
AmED consumers
-
decreased odds of sedation-based physiological outcomes
#2
co-consumption of energy drinks and alcohol (AmED)
decrease
sedation-based psychological outcomes
AmED consumers
-
decreased odds of sedation-based psychological outcomes
#3
co-consumption of energy drinks and alcohol (AmED)
increase
hazardous alcohol consumption patterns
AmED consumers
-
report more hazardous alcohol consumption patterns
#4
co-consumption of energy drinks and alcohol (AmED)
increase
risk-taking behaviour
AmED consumers
-
greater engagement in risk-taking behaviour
#5
co-consumption of energy drinks and alcohol (AmED)
decrease
risk-taking behaviour
-
-
lower odds of risk-taking behaviour
#6
mixing alcohol with energy drinks
increase
stimulation-based effects
-
-
increasing stimulation-based effects
#7
mixing alcohol with energy drinks
decrease
sedation-based outcomes
-
-
reducing sedation-based outcomes
#8
Abstract

AIMS: Alcohol mixed with energy drinks (AmED) is a relatively new consumption trend generating increasing concern regarding potential adverse effects. Despite the political and health imperative, there has been no systematic and independent synthesis of the literature to determine whether or not AmED offers additional harms relative to alcohol. The aim of this study was to review the evidence about whether co-consumption of energy drinks and alcohol, relative to alcohol alone, alters: (i) physiological, psychological, cognitive and psychomotor outcomes; (ii) hazardous drinking practices; and (iii) risk-taking behaviour. METHODS: Pubmed, PsycInfo and Embase databases were searched until May 2013 for papers outlining descriptive, observational analytical and human experimental studies which compared target outcomes for AmED versus alcohol consumers (between-subjects), or AmED versus alcohol consumption (within-subjects). Odds ratios were calculated for target outcomes following screening, data extraction and quality assessment. RESULTS: Data were extracted from 19 papers. Analyses typically revealed increased odds of self-reported stimulation-based outcomes and decreased odds of sedation-based physiological and psychological outcomes relative to when alcohol was consumed alone, as indicated by rigorous cross-sectional descriptive research. These findings typically have not been reflected in experimental research, due possibly to the low doses administered relative to typical self-reported 'real-life' intake. AmED consumers generally report more hazardous alcohol consumption patterns and greater engagement in risk-taking behaviour than alcohol consumers. While most studies had equivocal findings, two studies showed lower odds of risk-taking behaviour for AmED relative to alcohol drinking sessions but limitations with respect to the outcome measures used restrict conclusions with regard to the behavioural outcomes of AmED use. CONCLUSIONS: Mixing alcohol with energy drinks may exert a dual effect, increasing stimulation-based effects and reducing sedation-based outcomes; the clinical severity and dose threshold has not been established. At this stage it is unclear whether these changes in the nature of intoxication translate into greater alcohol intake and risk-taking behaviour.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesEnergy DrinksHumansRisk FactorsRisk-Taking
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety40
Efficacy60/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations51
Citations/Year4.6
Relative Citation Ratio2.77
NIH Percentile83.2%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.68
Normalized Score0.55
Related Supplements
'High' risk? A systematic review of the acute outcomes of mi... | Panacea Index