Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Iron dosing in kidney disease: inconsistency of evidence and clinical practice.

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association
February 1, 2015
Adam E Gaweda et al. (6 authors)
Journal ArticleResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the risks and benefits of iron administration alongside erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in CKD patients and propose a pharmacometric approach for individualized dosing.

Results Summary

The study highlights the challenges of balancing ESA and iron supplementation in CKD patients, noting potential risks of excessive iron dosing and the lack of systematic monitoring for iron overload. It suggests a need for individualized dosing strategies but does not provide conclusive efficacy or safety data for ESAs alone.

Population

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (5)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs)
increase
treatment options
previously transfusion-requiring patients
-
has increased treatment options
#1
erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs)
increase
side effects
-
-
has side effects
#2
parenteral iron supplementation
neutral
anemia treatment
-
-
is the second main form of anemia treatment
#3
iron administration
neutral
potential risks
CKD patients
-
has potential risks
#4
excessive iron dosing
neutral
potential risks
-
-
remains a topic of controversy
#5
Abstract

The management of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is difficult. The availability of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) has increased treatment options for previously transfusion-requiring patients, but the recent evidence of ESA side effects has prompted the search for complementary or alternative approaches. Next to ESA, parenteral iron supplementation is the second main form of anemia treatment. However, as of now, no systematic approach has been proposed to balance the concurrent administration of both agents according to individual patient's needs. Furthermore, the potential risks of excessive iron dosing remain a topic of controversy. How, when and whether to monitor CKD patients for potential iron overload remain to be elucidated. This review addresses the question of risk and benefit of iron administration in CKD, highlights the evidence supporting current practice, provides an overview of standard and potential new markers of iron status and outlines a new pharmacometric approach to physiologically compatible individualized dosing of ESA and iron in CKD patients.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Anemia, Iron-DeficiencyErythropoietinHematinicsHumansIron CompoundsIron OverloadRenal Insufficiency, Chronic
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety60
Efficacy70/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations23
Citations/Year2.3
Relative Citation Ratio0.95
NIH Percentile48.4%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.76
Normalized Score0.68