Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Comparison of two doses of elemental iron in the treatment of latent iron deficiency: efficacy, side effects and blinding capabilities.

Nutrients
January 1, 1970
Alecia J Leonard et al. (4 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine an effective ferrous sulfate dose that improves iron stores while minimizing side effects and enabling blinding in studies of iron deficiency.

Results Summary

Both 60 mg and 80 mg iron doses significantly improved ferritin levels compared to placebo, with no significant differences in side effects or compliance between iron groups. However, a majority of participants correctly guessed their treatment allocation despite blinding.

Population

32 women aged 18-35 years (24 with latent iron deficiency, 8 iron-sufficient controls).

Effective Dosage

60 mg or 80 mg elemental iron daily.

Duration

16 weeks.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (9)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
ferrous sulfate dose (60 mg elemental iron)
increase
ferritin change scores
women (18-35 years) with latent iron deficiency (serum ferritin < 20 µg/L)
-
had significantly higher ferritin change scores than placebo groups
#1
ferrous sulfate dose (80 mg elemental iron)
increase
ferritin change scores
women (18-35 years) with latent iron deficiency (serum ferritin < 20 µg/L)
-
had significantly higher ferritin change scores than placebo groups
#2
iron (60 mg or 80 mg elemental iron)
increase
side effects
participants on iron who completed the trial
77%
reported side effects
#3
placebo
increase
side effects
participants on placebo who completed the trial
45%
reported side effects
#4
iron (60 mg or 80 mg elemental iron)
increase
treatment allocation guessing
participants on iron
69%
correctly guessed their treatment allocation
#5
placebo
increase
treatment allocation guessing
participants on placebo
56%
correctly guessed their treatment allocation
#6
iron (60 mg or 80 mg elemental iron)
increase
ferritin levels
participants with latent iron deficiency
-
were equally effective in normalising
#7
iron (60 mg or 80 mg elemental iron)
no change
side effects
participants between iron groups
-
no differences in side effects
#8
iron (60 mg or 80 mg elemental iron)
no change
compliance
participants between iron groups
-
no differences in compliance
#9
Abstract

Adherence to iron supplementation can be compromised due to side effects, and these limit blinding in studies of iron deficiency. No studies have reported an efficacious iron dose that allows participants to remain blinded. This pilot study aimed to determine a ferrous sulfate dose that improves iron stores, while minimising side effects and enabling blinding. A double-blinded RCT was conducted in 32 women (18-35 years): 24 with latent iron deficiency (serum ferritin < 20 µg/L) and 8 iron sufficient controls. Participants with latent iron deficiency were randomised to 60 mg or 80 mg elemental iron or to placebo, for 16 weeks. The iron sufficient control group took placebo. Treatment groups (60 mg n = 7 and 80 mg n = 6) had significantly higher ferritin change scores than placebo groups (iron deficient n = 5 and iron sufficient n = 6), F(1, 23) = 8.46, p ≤ 0.01. Of the 24 who completed the trial, 10 participants (77%) on iron reported side effects, compared with 5 (45%) on placebo, but there were no differences in side effects (p = 0.29), or compliance (p = 0.60) between iron groups. Nine (69%) participants on iron, and 11 (56%) on placebo correctly guessed their treatment allocation. Both iron doses were equally effective in normalising ferritin levels. Although reported side-effects were similar for both groups, a majority of participants correctly guessed their treatment group.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdolescentAdultAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyDietary SupplementsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFerrous CompoundsFollow-Up StudiesHumansIron, DietaryNutritional StatusPatient CompliancePilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety70
Efficacy85/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations12
Citations/Year1.1
Relative Citation Ratio0.54
NIH Percentile29.1%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.68
Normalized Score0.78
Related Supplements
Comparison of two doses of elemental iron in the treatment o... | Panacea Index