Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Creatine supplementation during resistance training in older adults-a meta-analysis.

Medicine and science in sports and exercise
June 1, 2014
Michaela C Devries et al. (2 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisReviewSystematic ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine whether creatine supplementation combined with resistance training (RT) enhances muscle mass, strength, and functional performance in older adults compared to RT alone.

Results Summary

Cr + RT significantly increased total body mass, fat-free mass, chest press and leg press strength, and performance in the 30-second chair stand test compared to RT alone, but had no effect on fat mass, knee extension, biceps curl strength, or isokinetic/isometric torque.

Population

Older adults (average age ~64 years)

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

12.6 ± 4.9 weeks

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (11)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
Resistance training (RT)
increase
muscle mass and strength
older adults
-
increases
#1
Cr + RT
increase
total body mass
older adults
P = 0.004
increased
#2
Cr + RT
increase
fat-free mass
older adults
P < 0.0001
increased
#3
Cr + RT
no change
fat mass
older adults
-
had no effect on
#4
Cr + RT
increase
chest press one-repetition maximum
older adults
P = 0.004
increased
#5
Cr + RT
increase
leg press one-repetition maximum
older adults
P = 0.02
increased
#6
Cr + RT
no change
knee extension one-repetition maximum
older adults
-
had no difference in the effect on
#7
Cr + RT
no change
biceps curl one-repetition maximum
older adults
-
had no difference in the effect on
#8
Cr + RT
no change
isokinetic knee extension peak torque
older adults
-
had no difference in the effect on
#9
Cr + RT
no change
isometric knee extension peak torque
older adults
-
had no difference in the effect on
#10
Cr + RT
increase
the 30-s chair stand test
older adults
P = 0.03
had a greater effect than RT alone on
#11
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Age-related sarcopenia and dynapenia have negative effects on strength and the ability to perform activities of daily living. Resistance training (RT) increases muscle mass and strength in older adults and is an established countermeasure for sarcopenia and dynapenia, and creatine may enhance this effect. We aimed to determine whether the addition of Cr to RT increased gains in muscle mass, strength, and function in older adults over RT alone by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed and Healthstar databases were searched. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials that involved older adults supplemented with Cr and included RT regimens (>6 wk) were included. Data were analyzed using fixed or random (if data were heterogeneous) effects meta-analysis using RevMan 5. RESULTS: The meta-analysis comprised 357 older adults (average ± SD Cr: 63.6 ± 5.9 yr, Pl: 64.2 ± 5.4 yr) with 12.6 ± 4.9 wk of RT. Cr + RT increased total body mass (P = 0.004) and fat-free mass (P < 0.0001) with no effect on fat mass as compared with RT alone. Cr + RT increased chest press (P = 0.004) and leg press (P = 0.02) one-repetition maximum to a greater extent than RT alone, with no difference in the effect on knee extension or biceps curl one-repetition maximum, isokinetic or isometric knee extension peak torque. Cr + RT had a greater effect than RT alone on the 30-s chair stand test (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Retention of muscle mass and strength is integral to healthy aging. The results from this meta-analysis are encouraging in supporting a role for Cr supplementation during RT in healthful aging by enhancing muscle mass gain, strength, and functional performance over RT alone; however, the limited number of studies indicates further work is needed.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AgedBody CompositionBody Mass IndexCreatineDietary SupplementsHumansMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthPublication BiasResistance TrainingSarcopeniaWeight Lifting
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations137
Citations/Year12.5
Relative Citation Ratio6.22
NIH Percentile95.1%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score0.93
Normalized Score0.70
Related Supplements