Creatine supplementation and resistance training in vulnerable older women: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to examine the efficacy of creatine supplementation, with or without resistance training, in improving muscle strength, lean mass, and bone health in vulnerable older women.
Results Summary
The study found that creatine supplementation combined with resistance training (CR+RT) significantly improved muscle strength (1-RM leg press and bench press) and appendicular lean mass compared to other groups, but did not affect bone mass or fat mass. Resistance training alone (PL+RT) also improved muscle strength but not as effectively as CR+RT.
Population
Vulnerable older women (60 subjects).
Effective Dosage
Not specified in the abstract.
Duration
24 weeks.
Interactions
None mentioned.
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
creatine supplementation with resistance training | increase | 1-RM leg press | vulnerable older women | +19.9% | changes were significantly greater | #1 |
placebo | increase | 1-RM leg press | vulnerable older women | +2.4% | changes | #2 |
creatine supplementation | increase | 1-RM leg press | vulnerable older women | +3.7% | changes | #3 |
placebo with resistance training | increase | 1-RM leg press | vulnerable older women | +15% | changes | #4 |
creatine supplementation with resistance training | increase | 1-RM bench press | vulnerable older women | +10% | showed superior gains | #5 |
creatine supplementation with resistance training | increase | appendicular lean mass | vulnerable older women | +1.31% | showed greater accrual | #6 |
placebo | decrease | appendicular lean mass | vulnerable older women | -1.2% | changes | #7 |
creatine supplementation | increase | appendicular lean mass | vulnerable older women | +0.3% | changes | #8 |
placebo with resistance training | decrease | appendicular lean mass | vulnerable older women | -0.2% | changes | #9 |
creatine supplementation | increase | appendicular lean mass | vulnerable older women | - | experienced comparable gains | #10 |
placebo with resistance training | increase | appendicular lean mass | vulnerable older women | - | experienced comparable gains | #11 |
- | no change | fat mass | vulnerable older women | - | did not significantly differ | #12 |
- | no change | bone mass | vulnerable older women | - | did not significantly differ | #13 |
- | no change | serum bone markers | vulnerable older women | - | did not significantly differ | #14 |
creatine supplementation combined with resistance training | increase | appendicular lean mass | older vulnerable women | - | improved | #15 |
creatine supplementation combined with resistance training | increase | muscle function | older vulnerable women | - | improved | #16 |
creatine supplementation combined with resistance training | no change | bone mass | older vulnerable women | - | did not improve | #17 |
This study aimed to examine the efficacy of creatine supplementation, associated or not with resistance training, in vulnerable older women. A 24-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was performed. Sixty subjects were assigned to compose the following groups: placebo (PL), creatine supplementation (CR), placebo with resistance training (PL+RT), and creatine supplementation with resistance training (CR+RT). The subjects were assessed at baseline and after 24weeks. The primary outcome was muscle strength, as assessed by one-repetition maximum (1-RM) tests. Secondary outcomes included appendicular lean mass, bone mass, biochemical bone markers, and physical function tests. The changes in 1-RM leg press were significantly greater in the CR+RT group (+19.9%) than in the PL (+2.4%) and the CR groups (+3.7%), but not than in the PL+RT group (+15%) (p=0.002, p=0.002, and p=0.357, respectively). The CR+RT group showed superior gains in 1-RM bench press (+10%) when compared with all the other groups (p≤0.05). The CR+RT group (+1.31%) showed greater appendicular lean mass accrual than the PL (-1.2%), the CR (+0.3%), and the PL+RT groups (-0.2%) (p≤0.05). The CR and the PL+RT groups experienced comparable gains in appendicular lean mass (p=0.62), but superior to those seen in the PL group. Changes in fat mass, bone mass and serum bone markers did not significantly differ between the groups (p>0.05). In conclusion, creatine supplementation combined with resistance training improved appendicular lean mass and muscle function, but not bone mass, in older vulnerable women. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01472393.