A non-calorie-restricted low-carbohydrate diet is effective as an alternative therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to examine the effects of a non-calorie-restricted, low-carbohydrate diet on glycaemic control and metabolic profiles in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes who were unable to adhere to a calorie-restricted diet.
Results Summary
The low-carbohydrate diet significantly reduced HbA1c and improved triglyceride levels compared to the calorie-restricted diet, with no major adverse effects or decline in quality of life reported.
Population
Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes unable to adhere to a calorie-restricted diet.
Effective Dosage
Not specified
Duration
6 months
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
low-carbohydrate diet | decrease | HbA1c levels | Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes unable to adhere to a calorie-restricted diet | from baseline 7.6±0.4% to six months 7.0±0.7% | decreased significantly | #1 |
calorie-restricted diet | no change | HbA1c levels | Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes unable to adhere to a calorie-restricted diet | from baseline 7.7±0.6% to six months 7.5±1.0% | not decreased | #2 |
low-carbohydrate diet | decrease | triglyceride levels | Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes unable to adhere to a calorie-restricted diet | - | improvements | #3 |
low-carbohydrate diet | no change | major adverse effects | Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes unable to adhere to a calorie-restricted diet | - | without experiencing | #4 |
low-carbohydrate diet | no change | decline in the quality of life | Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes unable to adhere to a calorie-restricted diet | - | without experiencing | #5 |
OBJECTIVE: Although caloric restriction is a widely used intervention to reduce body weight and insulin resistance, many patients are unable to comply with such dietary therapy for long periods. The clinical effectiveness of low-carbohydrate diets was recently described in a position statement of Diabetes UK and a scientific review conducted by the American Diabetes Association. However, randomised trials of dietary interventions in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes are scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the effects of a non-calorie-restricted, low-carbohydrate diet in Japanese patients unable to adhere to a calorie-restricted diet. METHODS: The enrolled patients were randomly allocated to receive a conventional calorie-restricted diet or low-carbohydrate diet. The patients received consultations every two months from a registered dietician for six months. We compared the effects of the two dietary interventions on glycaemic control and metabolic profiles. RESULTS: The HbA1c levels decreased significantly from baseline to six months in the low-carbohydrate diet group (baseline 7.6±0.4%, six months 7.0±0.7%, p=0.03) but not in the calorie-restricted group (baseline 7.7±0.6%, six months 7.5±1.0%, n.s.), (between-group comparison, p=0.03). The patients in the former group also experienced improvements in their triglyceride levels, without experiencing any major adverse effects or a decline in the quality of life. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a low-carbohydrate diet is effective in lowering the HbA1c and triglyceride levels in patients with type 2 diabetes who are unable to adhere to a calorie-restricted diet.