Compliance with the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet: a systematic review.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to evaluate methods for assessing compliance with the DASH diet in interventional settings and to examine patients' adherence levels.
Results Summary
The study found varying methods to assess DASH compliance, with lower adherence in educational interventions compared to feeding trials. It highlighted the need for better approaches to sustain DASH dietary patterns beyond counseling alone.
Population
Patients in interventional settings involving DASH diet interventions (specific demographics not detailed).
Effective Dosage
Not specified
Duration
Not specified
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DASH diet | decrease | blood pressure | - | - | has been recognized as effective to lower | #1 |
DASH diet | increase | health benefits | - | - | compliance must be persistent to maximize | #2 |
educational interventions | decrease | compliance levels | - | - | Compliance levels were lower in | #3 |
BACKGROUND: The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet has been recognized as effective to lower blood pressure in feeding trials, but compliance with the diet must be persistent to maximize health benefits in clinical practice. This paper reports a systematic review of the latest evidence on the method to assess DASH compliance and the corresponding patients' compliance in interventional settings. METHODS: The databases including MEDLINE, EBM Reviews, EMBASE, and CINAHL Plus were searched for original research studies published in the period of January 1992-December 2012 that evaluated compliance with DASH diet. Studies written in English language, with DASH intervention, with complete documentation of the degree of DASH compliance and the assessment method used were included in this review. The search terms included: dietary approaches to stop hypertension, DASH, compliance, adherence, consistency, and concordance. RESULTS: Nine studies were included. Different types of interventions were identified, ranging from feeding trial to dietary counseling. These studies differed in the assessment methods used to evaluate DASH compliance, which included objective approaches like measurement of urinary excretion, and subjective approaches like dietary intake assessment for DASH target comparison and construction of DASH scoring systems. Compliance levels were lower in educational interventions than that of the original DASH feeding trial. CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, although no consensus existed regarding the best approach to assess DASH compliance, its suboptimal compliance warrants attention. This study implied a need to investigate effective approaches to sustain the DASH dietary pattern beyond counselling alone.