Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

The Auckland calcium study: 5-year post-trial follow-up.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
January 1, 2014
L T Radford et al. (7 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine whether the effects of calcium supplementation on fracture incidence, bone mineral density (BMD), and cardiovascular safety persisted after discontinuation of the supplement.

Results Summary

Over 10 years, calcium supplementation showed no effect on total or hip fracture incidence but significantly reduced forearm and vertebral fractures. The initial adverse cardiovascular effects and BMD benefits did not persist post-trial.

Population

1,471 postmenopausal women

Effective Dosage

1 g/day calcium citrate

Duration

5 years

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (19)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
calcium supplements
no change
total fracture incidence
postmenopausal women
-
no effect
#1
calcium supplements
decrease
vertebral fractures
postmenopausal women
-
significant reduction
#2
calcium supplements
decrease
forearm fractures
postmenopausal women
-
significant reduction
#3
calcium supplements
no change
bone density
a subset
-
no effect
#4
calcium supplements
no change
cardiovascular events
-
-
no increased risk
#5
1 g/day calcium citrate
no change
total fracture incidence
1,471 postmenopausal women
-
did not reduce
#6
1 g/day calcium citrate
no change
vertebral fracture incidence
1,471 postmenopausal women
-
did not reduce
#7
1 g/day calcium citrate
no change
forearm fracture incidence
1,471 postmenopausal women
-
did not reduce
#8
1 g/day calcium citrate
increase
hip fracture incidence
1,471 postmenopausal women
-
increased
#9
1 g/day calcium citrate
increase
bone mineral density (BMD)
1,471 postmenopausal women
-
had beneficial effects
#10
calcium
no change
total fracture
those assigned to calcium
HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.75-1.07
no effect
#11
calcium
no change
hip fracture incidence
those assigned to calcium
1.40, 0.89-2.21
no effect
#12
calcium
decrease
forearm fractures
those assigned to calcium
0.62, 0.43-0.89
significant reductions
#13
calcium
decrease
vertebral fractures
those assigned to calcium
0.52, 0.32-0.85
significant reductions
#14
calcium
no change
BMD
-
-
no between-group differences
#15
calcium
no change
adverse cardiovascular outcomes
-
-
did not persist
#16
Calcium supplementation for 5 years
no change
total fracture incidence
-
-
had no effect
#17
Calcium supplementation
no change
positive benefits on BMD
-
-
did not persist
#18
Calcium supplementation
no change
adverse cardiovascular effects
-
-
did not persist
#19
Abstract

UNLABELLED: Five years after completion of a randomised placebo-controlled trial of calcium supplements, there was no effect of calcium on total fracture incidence, a significant reduction in vertebral and forearm fractures and, in a subset, no effect on bone density. There was no increased risk of cardiovascular events after discontinuation of calcium. INTRODUCTION: The Auckland calcium study was a 5-year randomised controlled trial of 1 g/day calcium citrate in 1,471 postmenopausal women. Calcium did not reduce total, vertebral or forearm fracture incidence, increased hip fracture incidence and had beneficial effects on bone mineral density (BMD). A secondary analysis raised concerns about the cardiovascular safety of calcium. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the effects of calcium on fracture incidence, BMD and cardiovascular endpoints persisted after supplement discontinuation. METHODS: Approximately 5-years post-trial, we collected information on the 1,408 participants alive at trial completion from the national databases of hospital admissions and deaths. We contacted 1,174 women by phone, and from these we obtained information on medical events and post-trial calcium use. We undertook BMD measurements at 10 years in a selected subset of 194 women who took study medication for 5 years in the original trial, and did not take bone-active medications post-trial. RESULTS: Over the 10-year period, there was no effect on total fracture (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.75-1.07) or hip fracture incidence (1.40, 0.89-2.21), but significant reductions in forearm (0.62, 0.43-0.89) and vertebral fractures (0.52, 0.32-0.85) in those assigned to calcium. There were no between-group differences in BMD at 10 years at any site. The adverse cardiovascular outcomes observed in the 5-year trial did not persist post-trial. CONCLUSION: Calcium supplementation for 5 years had no effect on total fracture incidence at 10 years. The positive benefits on BMD and the adverse cardiovascular effects did not persist once supplements were stopped.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AgedBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsCalciumCardiovascular DiseasesDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHip FracturesHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedNew ZealandOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesWithholding Treatment
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety80
Efficacy65/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations21
Citations/Year1.9
Relative Citation Ratio0.88
NIH Percentile45.6%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.70
Normalized Score0.75
Related Supplements