Alcohol use biomarkers predicting cognitive performance: a secondary analysis in veterans with alcohol dependence and posttraumatic stress disorder.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to determine whether indirect alcohol use biomarkers, including alanine aminotransferase, could predict cognitive performance in veterans with alcohol dependence and PTSD.
Results Summary
The study found that indirect biomarkers like GGT and AST significantly predicted performance on certain neurocognitive tests, but alanine aminotransferase's specific role was not highlighted. Direct biomarkers did not show similar predictive value.
Population
30 veterans with alcohol dependence and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Effective Dosage
Not available
Duration
Not specified
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
indirect alcohol use biomarkers | null | Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised %Retention | veterans with alcohol dependence and PTSD | null | significantly predicted performance | #1 |
GGT | null | Trail Making Test part A | veterans with alcohol dependence and PTSD | null | significantly predicted performance | #2 |
direct alcohol use biomarkers | no change | identifying those veterans with alcohol dependence and PTSD who have impaired cognitive performance | veterans with alcohol dependence and PTSD | null | may not share such a role | #3 |
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a secondary analysis of baseline data from a recently completed pharmacological pilot clinical trial among 30 veterans with alcohol dependence and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This trial included baseline measures of alcohol use biomarkers, both indirect (carbohydrate-deficient transferrin, GGT [γ-glutamyltransferase], mean corpuscular volume, AST [aspartate aminotransferase], alanine aminotransferase) and direct (ethyl glucuronide, ethyl sulfate), as well as neurocognitive measures (Trail Making Test parts A and B, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, Balloon Analogue Risk Task, Delay Discounting Task). METHODS: Two regression models were estimated and tested for each neurocognitive measure (dependent measure). The first model included the alcohol use biomarker alone as the predictor. The second model included the alcohol use biomarker along with the following 3 additional predictors: Beck Depression Inventory, Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale, and receiving medications. RESULTS: In both models, the indirect biomarkers, such as GGT and AST, significantly predicted performance on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised %Retention. GGT alone significantly predicted performance on the Trail Making Test part A. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect alcohol use biomarkers may have a specific role in identifying those veterans with alcohol dependence and PTSD who have impaired cognitive performance. However, direct alcohol use biomarkers may not share such a role.