Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Urinary bladder cancer risk factors: a Lebanese case- control study.

Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
January 1, 2013
Loulou Hassan Kobeissi et al. (5 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to investigate potential risk factors for bladder cancer, including the consumption of artificial sweeteners, in a Lebanese population.

Results Summary

The study found no significant differences in bladder cancer risk between cases and controls regarding the consumption of artificial sweeteners.

Population

Lebanese men diagnosed with bladder cancer (cases) and hospital-based controls.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (7)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
smoking
increase
odds of having bladder cancer
cases vs. controls
1.02 times
was 1.02 times significantly higher
#1
exposure to occupational diesel or fuel combustion fumes
increase
odds
cases vs controls
4.1 times
were 4.1 times significantly higher
#2
prostate-related morbidity
increase
odds
cases vs controls
5.6 times
were 5.6 times significantly higher
#3
consumption of alcohol
no change
-
cases and controls
no significant differences
No significant differences
#4
consumption of coffee
no change
-
cases and controls
no significant differences
No significant differences
#5
consumption of tea
no change
-
cases and controls
no significant differences
No significant differences
#6
consumption of artificial sweeteners
no change
-
cases and controls
no significant differences
No significant differences
#7
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is the second most incident malignancy among Lebanese men. The purpose of this study was to investigate potential risk factors associated with this observed high incidence. METHODS: A case-control study (54 cases and 105 hospital-based controls) was conducted in two major hospitals in Beirut. Cases were randomly selected from patients diagnosed in the period of 2002-2008. Controls were conveniently selected from the same settings. Data were collected using interview questionnaire and blood analysis. Exposure data were collected using a structured face-to-face interview questionnaire. Blood samples were collected to determine N-acetyltransferase1 (NAT1) genotype by PCR-RFLP. Analyses revolved around univariate, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression, along with checks for effect modification. RESULTS: The odds of having bladder cancer among smokers was 1.02 times significantly higher in cases vs. controls. The odds of exposure to occupational diesel or fuel combustion fumes were 4.1 times significantly higher in cases vs controls. The odds of prostate-related morbidity were 5.6 times significantly higher in cases vs controls. Cases and controls showed different clustering patterns of NAT1 alleles. No significant differences between cases and controls were found for consumption of alcohol, coffee, tea, or artificial sweeteners. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case-control study investigating bladder cancer risk factors in the Lebanese context. Results confirmed established risk factors in the literature, particularly smoking and occupational exposure to diesel. The herein observed associations should be used to develop appropriate prevention policies and intervention strategies, in order to control this alarming disease in Lebanon.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AgedArylamine N-AcetyltransferaseCase-Control StudiesCoffeeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenotypeHumansIsoenzymesMaleOccupational ExposurePolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, GeneticPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthPrognosisRisk FactorsSmokingTeaUrinary Bladder Neoplasms
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy50/10
Quality70/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations34
Citations/Year2.8
Relative Citation Ratio1.36
NIH Percentile61.6%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.46
Normalized Score0.54
Related Supplements