Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Fructose as a key player in the development of fatty liver disease.

World journal of gastroenterology
January 1, 1970
Metin Basaranoglu et al. (4 authors)
Journal ArticleReviewHuman StudyAnimal Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to investigate the role of fructose and high-fat diets in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and related metabolic disorders.

Results Summary

The study found that high-fat diets contribute to obesity, insulin resistance, and fatty liver with minimal inflammation, while diets combining fructose and fats exacerbate hepatic fibrosis, inflammation, and lipoapoptosis. Increased hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNL) was identified as a key factor in fat accumulation in NAFLD patients.

Population

Mice (American Lifestyle-Induced Obesity Syndrome model) and human subjects with NAFLD, including obese and nonobese individuals, as well as patients with type 2 diabetes.

Effective Dosage

Not specified for high-fat diet; high-fructose corn syrup amounts relevant to American consumption levels.

Duration

Not specified.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (12)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
increased consumption of fructose
increase
fatty liver
-
-
is linked to the increased prevalence of
#1
obesity-related cytokines such as interleukin-6, adiponectin, leptin, and tumor necrosis factor-α
increase
nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)
-
-
may play important roles in the development of
#2
consumption of fructose
increase
plasma lipid profiles and metabolic changes
mice, the American Lifestyle-Induced Obesity Syndrome model
-
is associated with adverse alterations of
#3
Increased availability of fructose (e.g., high-fructose corn syrup)
increase
abnormal glucose flux and fructose metabolism in the hepatocyte
-
-
increases
#4
fructose
no change
insulin secretion
-
-
does not stimulate
#5
fructose
decrease
hepatic insulin signaling
-
-
provokes a hepatic stress response involving activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinases and subsequent reduced
#6
high fat diet alone
increase
obesity, insulin resistance, and some degree of fatty liver with minimal inflammation and no fibrosis
-
-
produces
#7
fast food diet which includes fructose and fats
increase
hepatic fibrosis, inflammation, endoplasmic reticulum stress and lipoapoptosis
-
-
produces a gene expression signature of increased
#8
-
increase
Hepatic de novo lipogenesis (fatty acid and triglyceride synthesis)
patients with NAFLD
-
is increased in patients with
#9
increased de novo lipogenesis (DNL)
increase
fat accumulation in the liver and the development of NAFLD
patients with NAFLD
-
contributed to
#10
DNL
increase
accumulated hepatic triglycerides
patients with NAFLD
26%
was responsible for
#11
DNL
increase
secreted very low-density lipoprotein triglycerides
patients with NAFLD
15%-23%
was responsible for
#12
Abstract

We aimed to investigate whether increased consumption of fructose is linked to the increased prevalence of fatty liver. The prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is 3% and 20% in nonobese and obese subjects, respectively. Obesity is a low-grade chronic inflammatory condition and obesity-related cytokines such as interleukin-6, adiponectin, leptin, and tumor necrosis factor-α may play important roles in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Additionally, the prevalence of NASH associated with both cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma was reported to be high among patients with type 2 diabetes with or without obesity. Our research group previously showed that consumption of fructose is associated with adverse alterations of plasma lipid profiles and metabolic changes in mice, the American Lifestyle-Induced Obesity Syndrome model, which included consumption of a high-fructose corn syrup in amounts relevant to that consumed by some Americans. The observation reinforces the concerns about the role of fructose in the obesity epidemic. Increased availability of fructose (e.g., high-fructose corn syrup) increases not only abnormal glucose flux but also fructose metabolism in the hepatocyte. Thus, the anatomic position of the liver places it in a strategic buffering position for absorbed carbohydrates and amino acids. Fructose was previously accepted as a beneficial dietary component because it does not stimulate insulin secretion. However, since insulin signaling plays an important role in central mechanisms of NAFLD, this property of fructose may be undesirable. Fructose has a selective hepatic metabolism, and provokes a hepatic stress response involving activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinases and subsequent reduced hepatic insulin signaling. As high fat diet alone produces obesity, insulin resistance, and some degree of fatty liver with minimal inflammation and no fibrosis, the fast food diet which includes fructose and fats produces a gene expression signature of increased hepatic fibrosis, inflammation, endoplasmic reticulum stress and lipoapoptosis. Hepatic de novo lipogenesis (fatty acid and triglyceride synthesis) is increased in patients with NAFLD. Stable-isotope studies showed that increased de novo lipogenesis (DNL) in patients with NAFLD contributed to fat accumulation in the liver and the development of NAFLD. Specifically, DNL was responsible for 26% of accumulated hepatic triglycerides and 15%-23% of secreted very low-density lipoprotein triglycerides in patients with NAFLD compared to an estimated less than 5% DNL in healthy subjects and 10% DNL in obese people with hyperinsulinemia. In conclusion, understanding the underlying causes of NAFLD forms the basis for rational preventive and treatment strategies of this major form of chronic liver disease.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AnimalsDietary CarbohydratesDietary FatsEpidemicsFast FoodsFatty LiverFructoseHumansInflammation MediatorsInsulin ResistanceLipogenesisLiverNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseObesityRisk FactorsSignal TransductionSweetening Agents
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety30
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations160
Citations/Year13.3
Relative Citation Ratio5.40
NIH Percentile93.9%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.01
Normalized Score0.58
Related Supplements