Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Anemia treatment of lymphoproliferative malignancies with erypoiesis: an overview of state of the art.

Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis
April 1, 2013
Daniel Limi Cacic et al. (3 authors)
Journal ArticleReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and impact of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) on hemoglobin response, quality of life, and adverse events in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies, particularly multiple myeloma.

Results Summary

The study found that ESAs were safe and effective, with 69.1% of patients achieving a hemoglobin response (>2g/dl increase). Iron supplementation improved response rates and reduced costs, while HYPO% was a significant predictor for hemoglobin response and iron need.

Population

Patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies, especially multiple myeloma.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (9)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
ESAs (erythropoiesis stimulating agents)
no change
mortality or serious adverse events
patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies, especially multiple myeloma
no significant change
safe and effective and not associated with an increase
#1
ESAs (erythropoiesis stimulating agents)
increase
hemoglobin
patients
69.1%
achieved a hemoglobin response
#2
ESAs (erythropoiesis stimulating agents)
increase
hemoglobin
patients
>2g/dl
increase in hemoglobin
#3
iron supplementation
increase
hemoglobin response rate
patients receiving ESAs and concomitant chemotherapy
-
increased
#4
iron supplementation
decrease
total dosage and financial cost
patients receiving ESAs and concomitant chemotherapy
-
reduced
#5
hemoglobin response
increase
quality of life
patients
-
accompanied by an increase
#6
HYPO% (hypochromic erythrocytes<5%)
neutral
Hb response
-
-
significant positive predictor
#7
HYPO% (hypochromic erythrocytes<5%)
neutral
iron supplementation
-
⩾5%
indicator for iron supplementation
#8
serum ferritin concentration and transferrin saturation
neutral
predictor for Hb response or indicator for iron supplementation
-
-
not reliable
#9
Abstract

Anemia is a common comorbidity of lymphoproliferative malignancies, especially in multiple myeloma. Blood transfusions and ESAs (erythropoiesis stimulating agents) are both possible treatment options, but the latter is often preferred because of the potential risks of unwanted side effects related to blood transfusions. Evidence is accumulating that the use of ESAs in above clinical conditions is safe and effective and not associated with an increase in mortality or serious adverse events. 69.1% of patients achieved a hemoglobin response defined as an increase in hemoglobin of>2g/dl while receiving ESAs and concomitant chemotherapy. If supplemented with iron the hemoglobin response rate can be increased and hence the total dosage and financial cost reduced. A hemoglobin response is often accompanied by an increase in quality of life. HYPO% (hypochromic erythrocytes<5%) is believed to be both a significant positive predictor for the Hb response and also an indicator for iron supplementation if⩾5%. Conventional biochemical markers like serum ferritin concentration and transferrin saturation are not reliable for this use. The effect of EPO stimulating agents as the predictor of the Hb response, quality of life, mortality and the potential adverse events are discussed.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AnemiaBlood TransfusionErythropoiesisFemaleFerritinsHematinicsHematologic NeoplasmsHemoglobinsHumansIronLymphoproliferative DisordersMaleQuality of Life
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety85
Efficacy80/10
Quality75/10
0
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.05
Weight Score0.56
Normalized Score0.81