Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Refractory celiac disease.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America
October 1, 2012
Georgia Malamut et al. (3 authors)
Journal ArticleReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to review the clinical and pathologic features of refractory celiac disease (RCD) and explore recent pathogenic findings in RCDII, particularly its link to T-cell lymphomagenesis.

Results Summary

The study found that a subset of celiac disease patients becomes refractory to a gluten-free diet, leading to persistent symptoms and intestinal damage. RCDII, a severe form, is identified as a low-grade intraepithelial lymphoma with poor prognosis.

Population

Patients with celiac disease who develop refractory symptoms despite a gluten-free diet.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (2)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
gluten-free diet
no change
symptoms of malabsorption and intestinal villous atrophy
small subset of patients with celiac disease
-
become refractory to
#1
-
neutral
type II RCD (RCDII)
-
-
has a poor prognosis
#2
Abstract

A small subset of patients with celiac disease become refractory to a gluten-free diet, with persistent or recurrent symptoms of malabsorption and intestinal villous atrophy. This condition, defined as refractory celiac disease (RCD), is diagnosed after other small bowel diseases with villous atrophy are excluded. RCD is subdivided into 2 subgroups: type I RCD and type II RCD (RCDII). This latter condition is considered a low-grade intraepithelial lymphoma and has a poor prognosis. This article reviews the clinical and pathologic features of RCD and recent pathogenic findings in RCDII, offering a model to study how inflammation can drive T-cell lymphomagenesis.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Celiac DiseaseDiet, Gluten-FreeHumansInterleukin-15Intestinal MucosaLymphocytesTreatment Failure
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy30/10
Quality70/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations11
Citations/Year0.8
Relative Citation Ratio0.38
NIH Percentile20.4%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score0.63
Normalized Score0.46
Related Supplements