Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Calcium builds strong bones, and more is better--correct? Well, maybe not.

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN
November 1, 2012
Sophie A Jamal et al. (2 authors)
Journal ArticleReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of calcium supplementation for osteoporosis and its implications for phosphate binder use in CKD.

Results Summary

The study found conflicting data on the antifracture efficacy of calcium supplementation, particularly in high doses, and raised concerns about an increased risk of cardiovascular events. These findings challenge the traditional use of calcium as a gold standard therapy for osteoporosis and phosphate binders in CKD.

Population

Patients with osteoporosis without CKD and implications for CKD patients.

Effective Dosage

High doses (specific amounts not mentioned)

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (3)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
calcium supplementation
neutral
osteoporosis
the general population
-
has been considered the gold standard therapy
#1
calcium supplementation
no change
antifracture efficacy
patients with osteoporosis without CKD
-
demonstrate conflicting data on the antifracture efficacy
#2
calcium supplementation
increase
cardiovascular events
-
-
suggest an increased risk
#3
Abstract

Calcium supplementation has been considered the gold standard therapy for osteoporosis in the general population. It is given in both the placebo and treatment groups of trials evaluating antifracture efficacy of new therapies. Similarly, calcium-based phosphate binders have been considered the gold standard comparator for all new phosphate binders. However, large randomized trials demonstrate conflicting data on the antifracture efficacy of calcium supplementation, particularly in high doses, in patients with osteoporosis without CKD. In addition, recent data suggest an increased risk for cardiovascular events. These new studies raise safety concerns for the general approach with calcium supplementation and binders. This review describes recent data on the adverse effects of calcium supplementation for osteoporosis and how these new data should affect the strategy for phosphate binder use in CKD.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Bone DensityCalciumDietary SupplementsHumansOsteoporosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRenal Insufficiency, Chronic
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety40
Efficacy50/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations6
Citations/Year0.5
Relative Citation Ratio0.23
NIH Percentile11.7%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.25
Weight Score1.26
Normalized Score0.51
Related Supplements