Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Narrowband ultraviolet B three times per week is more effective in treating vitamin D deficiency than 1600 IU oral vitamin D₃ per day: a randomized clinical trial.

The British journal of dermatology
September 1, 2012
M K B Bogh et al. (5 authors)
Comparative StudyJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effects of NB-UVB exposure versus oral vitamin D3 supplementation (with calcium) on improving vitamin D levels in deficient patients.

Results Summary

The study found that NB-UVB was more effective than oral vitamin D3 (with calcium) in increasing 25(OH)D3 levels, but calcium's specific effects were not isolated or discussed.

Population

73 participants with vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D3 ≤ 25 nmol/L).

Effective Dosage

1,000 mg calcium daily (combined with 1600 IU vitamin D3).

Duration

6 weeks.

Interactions

None mentioned.

Extracted Claims (7)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) radiation
increase
serum levels of vitamin D, expressed as 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) [25(OH)D(3)]
-
-
can improve
#1
oral vitamin D(3) supplementation
increase
serum levels of vitamin D, expressed as 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) [25(OH)D(3)]
-
-
can improve
#2
full body NB-UVB exposure three times per week
increase
25(OH)D(3) levels (mean)
patients with vitamin D deficiency
from 19·2 to 75 nmol L(-1)
significantly greater increase
#3
1600 IU (40 μg) oral vitamin D(3) per day together with 1,000 mg calcium
increase
25(OH)D(3) levels (mean)
patients with vitamin D deficiency
from 23·3 to 60·6 nmol L(-1)
increase
#4
full body NB-UVB exposure three times per week
increase
vitamin D deficiency
patients with vitamin D deficiency
-
more effective in treating
#5
daily oral intake of 1600 IU (40 μg) vitamin D(3)
increase
vitamin D deficiency
patients with vitamin D deficiency
-
less effective in treating
#6
full body NB-UVB exposure three times per week and 1600 IU (40 μg) oral vitamin D(3) per day together with 1,000 mg calcium
decrease
parathyroid hormone
patients with vitamin D deficiency
from 5·3 to 4·2 pmol L(-1)
significant decrease
#7
Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is known that narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) radiation and oral vitamin D(3) supplementation can both improve serum levels of vitamin D, expressed as 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) [25(OH)D(3) ]. However, surprisingly few studies have compared the effects of the two interventions in treating vitamin D deficiency. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of NB-UVB exposure with oral vitamin D(3) supplementation on vitamin D levels in patients with vitamin D deficiency. METHODS: Seventy-three participants with vitamin D deficiency [25(OH)D(3) ≤ 25 nmol L(-1) ] were consecutively enrolled from February 2010 to May 2011, avoiding the summer period (June to September). The participants were randomized into two groups, one receiving full body NB-UVB exposure three times per week, the other receiving 1600 IU (40 μg) oral vitamin D(3) per day together with 1,000 mg calcium. Thirty-two participants completed the 6-week study period, 16 in each group. In both groups blood samples were obtained at baseline and after 3 and 6 weeks. RESULTS: We found a significantly greater increase in 25(OH)D(3) levels (mean) in the NB-UVB treated group (from 19·2 to 75 nmol L(-1) ) compared with the oral vitamin D(3) treated group (from 23·3 to 60·6 nmol L(-1) ) after 6 weeks of treatment (P = 0·02), accompanied by a significant decrease in parathyroid hormone for the whole group (from 5·3 to 4·2 pmol L(-1) , P = 0·028). CONCLUSIONS: Full body NB-UVB three times per week is more effective in treating vitamin D deficiency than prescription of a daily oral intake of 1600 IU (40 μg) vitamin D(3) .

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Administration, OralAdultCholecalciferolDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeUltraviolet TherapyVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyVitamins
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy70/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations31
Citations/Year2.4
Relative Citation Ratio1.22
NIH Percentile57.7%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.47
Normalized Score0.64
Related Supplements