Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Calcium intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: a review of prospective studies and randomized clinical trials.

American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions
January 1, 1970
Lu Wang et al. (3 authors)
Journal ArticleResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the role of calcium intake, both dietary and supplemental, in the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adults.

Results Summary

The study found inconsistent evidence regarding the effect of dietary calcium intake on CVD risk, with pooled data not strongly supporting significant benefits. Calcium supplementation showed no significant reduction in CVD risk, and secondary analyses suggested a neutral effect.

Population

Middle-aged and older adults.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (13)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
calcium
neutral
CVD
-
-
may affect the risk of developing
#1
calcium
neutral
blood cholesterol
-
-
may affect the risk of developing
#2
calcium
neutral
insulin secretion and sensitivity
-
-
may affect the risk of developing
#3
calcium
neutral
vasodilation
-
-
may affect the risk of developing
#4
calcium
neutral
inflammatory profile
-
-
may affect the risk of developing
#5
calcium
neutral
thrombosis
-
-
may affect the risk of developing
#6
calcium
neutral
obesity
-
-
may affect the risk of developing
#7
calcium
neutral
vascular calcification
-
-
may affect the risk of developing
#8
greater dietary calcium intake
no change
risk of coronary artery disease (CAD)
middle-aged and older adults
-
do not strongly support a significant effect
#9
greater dietary calcium intake
no change
risk of stroke
middle-aged and older adults
-
do not strongly support a significant effect
#10
calcium supplement use
no change
risk of CAD
-
-
show no significant benefits
#11
calcium supplement use
no change
risk of stroke
-
-
show no significant benefits
#12
calcium (with or without vitamin D) supplements
no change
CVD events
-
-
suggest a neutral effect
#13
Abstract

The potential effects of inadequate or excessive calcium supply on cardiovascular disease (CVD) are receiving growing attention. We review experimental, epidemiologic, and clinical evidence regarding the role of calcium intake in the development of CVD in adults. In vitro and in vivo laboratory studies have shown that calcium may affect the risk of developing CVD through multiple mechanisms including blood cholesterol, insulin secretion and sensitivity, vasodilation, inflammatory profile, thrombosis, obesity, and vascular calcification. A number of prospective epidemiologic studies have examined the relationship between dietary calcium intake and CVD incidence or mortality in middle-aged and older adults. The results were inconsistent, and the pooled data do not strongly support a significant effect of greater dietary calcium intake on the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) or stroke. Only a few prospective studies have examined calcium supplement use in association with risk of CVD. The pooled data show no significant benefits of calcium supplement use in reducing the risk of CAD or stroke. No randomized clinical trial has specifically tested the effect of calcium supplementation on CVD as its primary endpoint. Secondary analyses in existing trials to date suggest a neutral effect of calcium (with or without vitamin D) supplements on CVD events, but do not allow for a definitive conclusion. A large percentage of Americans, particularly older adults, fail to meet the US recommendations for optimal calcium intake and are encouraged to increase daily calcium consumption. More prospective cohort studies and large-scale randomized trials are needed to further evaluate the risks or benefits of calcium supplementation on CVD endpoints as the primary pre-specified outcome.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultAgedCalciumCalcium, DietaryCardiovascular DiseasesDietary SupplementsHumansNutrition PolicyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsUnited States
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety75
Efficacy50/10
Quality70/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations88
Citations/Year6.8
Relative Citation Ratio3.03
NIH Percentile85.2%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score1.79
Normalized Score0.64
Related Supplements