Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Vitamin D with or without calcium supplementation for prevention of cancer and fractures: an updated meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Annals of internal medicine
January 1, 1970
Mei Chung et al. (5 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.ReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

To examine the benefits and harms of vitamin D with or without calcium supplementation on clinical outcomes of cancer and fractures in adults.

Results Summary

Combined vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduced fracture risk in older adults, particularly in institutional settings, but effects were smaller among community-dwelling individuals. Evidence for cancer prevention was inconclusive, with mixed results across different cancer types.

Population

Older adults (aged≥65 years), primarily postmenopausal women.

Effective Dosage

High-dose vitamin D (1000 IU/d) was mentioned, but specific calcium dosage was not detailed.

Duration

Not specified in the abstract.

Interactions

Increased risk for renal and urinary tract stones was noted with supplementation.

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
high-dose (1000 IU/d) vitamin D supplementation
decrease
total cancer
-
-
can reduce the risk for
#1
higher blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-[OH]D) concentrations
increase
risk for cancer
-
-
might be associated with
#2
each 10-nmol/L increase in blood 25-(OH)D concentration
decrease
colorectal cancer
-
6% (95% CI, 3% to 9%)
was associated with a reduced risk for
#3
each 10-nmol/L increase in blood 25-(OH)D concentration
no change
prostate and breast cancer
-
no statistically significant
no statistically significant dose-response relationships for
#4
combined vitamin D and calcium supplementation
decrease
fracture risk
older adults
pooled relative risk, 0.88 [CI, 0.78 to 0.99]
reduced
#5
combined vitamin D and calcium supplementation
decrease
fracture risk
institution
relative risk, 0.71 [CI, 0.57 to 0.89]
reduced
#6
combined vitamin D and calcium supplementation
decrease
fracture risk
community-dwelling
relative risk, 0.89 [CI, 0.76 to 1.04]
reduced
#7
supplementation
increase
renal and urinary tract stones
-
-
increased risk for
#8
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that vitamin D supplementation may reduce cancer and fracture risks. PURPOSE: To examine the benefits and harms of vitamin D with or without calcium supplementation on clinical outcomes of cancer and fractures in adults. DATA SOURCES: English-language studies identified from MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through July 2011. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort studies, and nested case-control studies reporting incidence of or death from cancer and fracture outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Multiple reviewers extracted details about participant characteristics, including baseline vitamin D status and use of supplements; details of statistical analyses, including adjustments for confounding; and methodological quality. Differences were resolved by consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: 19 RCTs (3 for cancer and 16 for fracture outcomes) and 28 observational studies (for cancer outcomes) were analyzed. Limited data from RCTs suggested that high-dose (1000 IU/d) vitamin D supplementation can reduce the risk for total cancer, and data from observational studies suggested that higher blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-[OH]D) concentrations might be associated with increased risk for cancer. Mixed-effects dose-response meta-analyses showed that each 10-nmol/L increase in blood 25-(OH)D concentration was associated with a 6% (95% CI, 3% to 9%) reduced risk for colorectal cancer but no statistically significant dose-response relationships for prostate and breast cancer. Random-effects model meta-analysis showed that combined vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduced fracture risk (pooled relative risk, 0.88 [CI, 0.78 to 0.99]) in older adults, but the effects differed according to study setting: institution (relative risk, 0.71 [CI, 0.57 to 0.89]) versus community-dwelling (relative risk, 0.89 [CI, 0.76 to 1.04]). One RCT showed adverse outcomes associated with supplementation, including increased risk for renal and urinary tract stones. LIMITATIONS: Most trial participants were older (aged≥65 years) postmenopausal women. Observational studies were heterogeneous and were limited by potential confounders. CONCLUSION: Combined vitamin D and calcium supplementation can reduce fracture risk, but the effects may be smaller among community-dwelling older adults than among institutionalized elderly persons. Appropriate dose and dosing regimens, however, require further study. Evidence is not sufficiently robust to draw conclusions regarding the benefits or harms of vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of cancer. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2Advisory CommitteesAge FactorsCalciumDietary SupplementsFractures, BoneHumansNeoplasmsSex FactorsUnited StatesUrinary CalculiVitamin D
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety70
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations276
Citations/Year19.7
Relative Citation Ratio8.74
NIH Percentile97.3%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.95
Weight Score2.17
Normalized Score0.75
Related Supplements
Vitamin D with or without calcium supplementation for preven... | Panacea Index