Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Efficacy and safety of iron supplementation for the elderly patients undergoing hip or knee surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The Journal of surgical research
December 1, 2011
Yuehua Yang et al. (6 authors)
Journal ArticleMeta-AnalysisHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of iron supplementation in treating anemia in elderly patients undergoing hip or knee surgery.

Results Summary

The meta-analysis found that iron supplementation increased hemoglobin levels but showed no significant difference in hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, infection rate, transfusion needs, or adverse effects compared to no treatment.

Population

Elderly patients undergoing hip or knee surgery.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (9)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
iron supplementation
increase
hemoglobin level
patients undergoing hip or knee surgery
-
demonstrated the increase of
#1
iron supplementation
no change
length of hospital stay
patients undergoing hip or knee surgery
-
no significant difference on
#2
iron supplementation
no change
morbidity
patients undergoing hip or knee surgery
-
no significant difference on
#3
iron supplementation
no change
1-mo mortality
patients undergoing hip or knee surgery
-
no significant difference on
#4
iron supplementation
no change
the infection rate
patients undergoing hip or knee surgery
-
no significant difference on
#5
iron supplementation
no change
the rate of allogeneic blood transfusions
patients undergoing hip or knee surgery
-
no significant difference on
#6
iron supplementation
no change
the volume of allogeneic blood transfusions
patients undergoing hip or knee surgery
-
no significant difference on
#7
iron supplementation
no change
the adverse drug effects
patients undergoing hip or knee surgery
-
no significant difference on
#8
iron supplementation
decrease
anemia
elderly patients undergoing hip or knee surgery
-
was safe and effective in treating
#9
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anemia is a frequent co-morbidity in the elderly patients undergoing hip or knee surgery and is often associated with poor clinical outcomes. Mild to moderate anemia is often treated with intravenous or oral iron supplementation. However, the efficacy and safety of iron supplementation in treating anemia for the elderly patients undergoing hip or knee surgery remains controversial. METHODS: Only prospective, randomized studies that compared iron supplementation with no iron supplementation in the elderly patients undergoing hip or knee surgery were included. Six studies met the inclusion criteria: the target population consisted of patients undergoing hip or knee surgery treated with iron supplementation; the study was a published randomized trial. Each outcome measure tested was assessed for heterogeneity. If significant heterogeneity was present for more than 75%, data from the studies were not combined. If there was no significant heterogeneity (less than 40%), a weighted mean difference (WMD) or combined relative risk was calculated using a fixed effects model, while a random effects model was applied when heterogeneity was within 40% to 75%. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated the increase of hemoglobin level in patients undergoing hip or knee surgery with iron supplementation. However, no significant difference on the length of hospital stay, morbidity, 1-mo mortality, the infection rate, the rate and volume of allogeneic blood transfusions, and the adverse drug effects was found between the patients with iron treatment and those without. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggested that iron supplementation was safe and effective in treating anemia for the elderly patients undergoing hip or knee surgery.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AgedAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeComorbidityHemoglobinsHip FracturesHumansIronRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk Factors
Study Links
Quality Scores
Safety85
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations36
Citations/Year2.6
Relative Citation Ratio1.54
NIH Percentile66.1%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.39
Normalized Score0.80
Related Supplements