Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Mindful "Vitality in Practice": an intervention to improve the work engagement and energy balance among workers; the development and design of the randomised controlled trial.

BMC public health
January 1, 1970
Jantien van Berkel et al. (5 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate the effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on work engagement and energy balance among highly educated workers to prevent mental health issues and overweight.

Results Summary

The intervention included mindfulness training, e-coaching, and workplace support elements. Baseline data showed average work engagement and low vigorous physical activity, with no significant differences between groups except for physical activity. The intervention was deemed appropriate for testing in the planned RCT.

Population

Highly educated workers in two Dutch research institutes.

Effective Dosage

Eight weeks of customized mindfulness training, followed by eight sessions of e-coaching.

Duration

12 months (with measurements at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months).

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (6)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
eight weeks of customized mindfulness training, followed by eight sessions of e-coaching and supporting elements, such as providing fruit and snack vegetables at the workplace, lunch walking routes, and a buddy system
neutral
effects
highly educated workers in two Dutch research institutes
-
will be evaluated
#1
-
no change
level of work engagement
the sample
"average"
was
#2
-
no change
vigorous physical activity
60.1% of the study population
at all
did not engage
#3
-
no change
sedentary hours
an average working day
eight
consists of
#4
-
no change
baseline characteristics
the intervention and the control group
-
were no significant differences
#5
-
no change
vigorous physical activity
the intervention and the control group at baseline
-
were no significant differences
#6
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern working life has become more mental and less physical in nature, contributing to impaired mental health and a disturbed energy balance. This may result in mental health problems and overweight. Both are significant threats to the health of workers and thus also a financial burden for society, including employers. Targeting work engagement and energy balance could prevent impaired mental health and overweight, respectively. METHODS/DESIGN: The study population consists of highly educated workers in two Dutch research institutes. The intervention was systematically developed, based on the Intervention Mapping (IM) protocol, involving workers and management in the process. The workers' needs were assessed by combining the results of interviews, focus group discussions and a questionnaire with available literature. Suitable methods and strategies were selected resulting in an intervention including: eight weeks of customized mindfulness training, followed by eight sessions of e-coaching and supporting elements, such as providing fruit and snack vegetables at the workplace, lunch walking routes, and a buddy system. The effects of the intervention will be evaluated in a RCT, with measurements at baseline, six months (T1) and 12 months (T2). In addition, cost-effectiveness and process of the intervention will also be evaluated. DISCUSSION: At baseline the level of work engagement of the sample was "average". Of the study population, 60.1% did not engage in vigorous physical activity at all. An average working day consists of eight sedentary hours. For the Phase II RCT, there were no significant differences between the intervention and the control group at baseline, except for vigorous physical activity. The baseline characteristics of the study population were congruent with the results of the needs assessment. The IM protocol used for the systematic development of the intervention produced an appropriate intervention to test in the planned RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR2199.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultDietFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedNetherlandsOccupational HealthOverweightSurveys and QuestionnairesWalkingWorkplace
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality85/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations23
Citations/Year1.6
Relative Citation Ratio1.11
NIH Percentile54.1%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.83
Normalized Score0.67
Related Supplements