Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Effect of resistance training regimens on treadmill running and neuromuscular performance in recreational endurance runners.

Journal of sports sciences
October 1, 2011
Jussi Mikkola et al. (6 authors)
Controlled Clinical TrialJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to compare the effects of heavy resistance, explosive resistance, and muscle endurance training on neuromuscular, endurance, and high-intensity running performance in recreational endurance runners.

Results Summary

Heavy and explosive resistance training improved maximal strength and neuromuscular characteristics, while heavy resistance training also enhanced high-intensity running performance. All three training modes improved maximal endurance running performance, with minimal effects on VO₂max and running economy.

Population

27 male recreational endurance runners

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

8-week resistance training program (following 6 weeks of preparatory training)

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (15)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
heavy resistance training
increase
maximal strength
recreational endurance runners
P = 0.034, effect size ES = 0.38
improved
#1
explosive resistance training
increase
maximal strength
recreational endurance runners
P = 0.003, ES = 0.67
improved
#2
heavy resistance training
increase
leg muscle activation
recreational endurance runners
P = 0.032, ES = 0.38
increases in
#3
explosive resistance training
increase
leg muscle activation
recreational endurance runners
P = 0.002, ES = 0.77
increases in
#4
heavy resistance training
increase
maximal running speed in the maximal anaerobic running test
recreational endurance runners
P = 0.012, ES = 0.52
improved
#5
heavy resistance training
increase
jump height
recreational endurance runners
P = 0.006, ES = 0.59
improved
#6
heavy resistance training
increase
maximal endurance running performance
recreational endurance runners
P = 0.005, ES = 0.56
improved
#7
explosive resistance training
increase
maximal endurance running performance
recreational endurance runners
P = 0.034, ES = 0.39
improved
#8
muscle endurance training
increase
maximal endurance running performance
recreational endurance runners
P = 0.001, ES = 0.94
improved
#9
heavy resistance training
increase
maximal oxygen uptake ([V·]O(₂max))
recreational endurance runners
ES = 0.08
small though not statistically significant improvements in
#10
explosive resistance training
increase
maximal oxygen uptake ([V·]O(₂max))
recreational endurance runners
ES = 0.29
small though not statistically significant improvements in
#11
muscle endurance training
increase
maximal oxygen uptake ([V·]O(₂max))
recreational endurance runners
ES = 0.65
small though not statistically significant improvements in
#12
heavy resistance training
increase
running economy
recreational endurance runners
ES < 0.08
small though not statistically significant improvements in
#13
explosive resistance training
increase
running economy
recreational endurance runners
ES < 0.08
small though not statistically significant improvements in
#14
muscle endurance training
increase
running economy
recreational endurance runners
ES < 0.08
small though not statistically significant improvements in
#15
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of heavy resistance, explosive resistance, and muscle endurance training on neuromuscular, endurance, and high-intensity running performance in recreational endurance runners. Twenty-seven male runners were divided into one of three groups: heavy resistance, explosive resistance or muscle endurance training. After 6 weeks of preparatory training, the groups underwent an 8-week resistance training programme as a supplement to endurance training. Before and after the 8-week training period, maximal strength (one-repetition maximum), electromyographic activity of the leg extensors, countermovement jump height, maximal speed in the maximal anaerobic running test, maximal endurance performance, maximal oxygen uptake ([V·]O(₂max)), and running economy were assessed. Maximal strength improved in the heavy (P = 0.034, effect size ES = 0.38) and explosive resistance training groups (P = 0.003, ES = 0.67) with increases in leg muscle activation (heavy: P = 0.032, ES = 0.38; explosive: P = 0.002, ES = 0.77). Only the heavy resistance training group improved maximal running speed in the maximal anaerobic running test (P = 0.012, ES = 0.52) and jump height (P = 0.006, ES = 0.59). Maximal endurance running performance was improved in all groups (heavy: P = 0.005, ES = 0.56; explosive: P = 0.034, ES = 0.39; muscle endurance: P = 0.001, ES = 0.94), with small though not statistically significant improvements in [V·]O(₂max) (heavy: ES = 0.08; explosive: ES = 0.29; muscle endurance: ES = 0.65) and running economy (ES in all groups < 0.08). All three modes of strength training used concurrently with endurance training were effective in improving treadmill running endurance performance. However, both heavy and explosive strength training were beneficial in improving neuromuscular characteristics, and heavy resistance training in particular contributed to improvements in high-intensity running characteristics. Thus, endurance runners should include heavy resistance training in their training programmes to enhance endurance performance, such as improving sprinting ability at the end of a race.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultExercise TestHumansLegMaleMuscle StrengthMuscle, SkeletalOxygen ConsumptionPhysical EndurancePhysical FitnessRecreationResistance TrainingRunning
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality78/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations43
Citations/Year3.1
Relative Citation Ratio2.31
NIH Percentile78.6%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.50
Weight Score1.39
Normalized Score0.70
Related Supplements
Effect of resistance training regimens on treadmill running ... | Panacea Index