Effect of resistance training regimens on treadmill running and neuromuscular performance in recreational endurance runners.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to compare the effects of heavy resistance, explosive resistance, and muscle endurance training on neuromuscular, endurance, and high-intensity running performance in recreational endurance runners.
Results Summary
Heavy and explosive resistance training improved maximal strength and neuromuscular characteristics, while heavy resistance training also enhanced high-intensity running performance. All three training modes improved maximal endurance running performance, with minimal effects on VO₂max and running economy.
Population
27 male recreational endurance runners
Effective Dosage
Not specified
Duration
8-week resistance training program (following 6 weeks of preparatory training)
Interactions
None mentioned
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
heavy resistance training | increase | maximal strength | recreational endurance runners | P = 0.034, effect size ES = 0.38 | improved | #1 |
explosive resistance training | increase | maximal strength | recreational endurance runners | P = 0.003, ES = 0.67 | improved | #2 |
heavy resistance training | increase | leg muscle activation | recreational endurance runners | P = 0.032, ES = 0.38 | increases in | #3 |
explosive resistance training | increase | leg muscle activation | recreational endurance runners | P = 0.002, ES = 0.77 | increases in | #4 |
heavy resistance training | increase | maximal running speed in the maximal anaerobic running test | recreational endurance runners | P = 0.012, ES = 0.52 | improved | #5 |
heavy resistance training | increase | jump height | recreational endurance runners | P = 0.006, ES = 0.59 | improved | #6 |
heavy resistance training | increase | maximal endurance running performance | recreational endurance runners | P = 0.005, ES = 0.56 | improved | #7 |
explosive resistance training | increase | maximal endurance running performance | recreational endurance runners | P = 0.034, ES = 0.39 | improved | #8 |
muscle endurance training | increase | maximal endurance running performance | recreational endurance runners | P = 0.001, ES = 0.94 | improved | #9 |
heavy resistance training | increase | maximal oxygen uptake ([V·]O(₂max)) | recreational endurance runners | ES = 0.08 | small though not statistically significant improvements in | #10 |
explosive resistance training | increase | maximal oxygen uptake ([V·]O(₂max)) | recreational endurance runners | ES = 0.29 | small though not statistically significant improvements in | #11 |
muscle endurance training | increase | maximal oxygen uptake ([V·]O(₂max)) | recreational endurance runners | ES = 0.65 | small though not statistically significant improvements in | #12 |
heavy resistance training | increase | running economy | recreational endurance runners | ES < 0.08 | small though not statistically significant improvements in | #13 |
explosive resistance training | increase | running economy | recreational endurance runners | ES < 0.08 | small though not statistically significant improvements in | #14 |
muscle endurance training | increase | running economy | recreational endurance runners | ES < 0.08 | small though not statistically significant improvements in | #15 |
The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of heavy resistance, explosive resistance, and muscle endurance training on neuromuscular, endurance, and high-intensity running performance in recreational endurance runners. Twenty-seven male runners were divided into one of three groups: heavy resistance, explosive resistance or muscle endurance training. After 6 weeks of preparatory training, the groups underwent an 8-week resistance training programme as a supplement to endurance training. Before and after the 8-week training period, maximal strength (one-repetition maximum), electromyographic activity of the leg extensors, countermovement jump height, maximal speed in the maximal anaerobic running test, maximal endurance performance, maximal oxygen uptake ([V·]O(₂max)), and running economy were assessed. Maximal strength improved in the heavy (P = 0.034, effect size ES = 0.38) and explosive resistance training groups (P = 0.003, ES = 0.67) with increases in leg muscle activation (heavy: P = 0.032, ES = 0.38; explosive: P = 0.002, ES = 0.77). Only the heavy resistance training group improved maximal running speed in the maximal anaerobic running test (P = 0.012, ES = 0.52) and jump height (P = 0.006, ES = 0.59). Maximal endurance running performance was improved in all groups (heavy: P = 0.005, ES = 0.56; explosive: P = 0.034, ES = 0.39; muscle endurance: P = 0.001, ES = 0.94), with small though not statistically significant improvements in [V·]O(₂max) (heavy: ES = 0.08; explosive: ES = 0.29; muscle endurance: ES = 0.65) and running economy (ES in all groups < 0.08). All three modes of strength training used concurrently with endurance training were effective in improving treadmill running endurance performance. However, both heavy and explosive strength training were beneficial in improving neuromuscular characteristics, and heavy resistance training in particular contributed to improvements in high-intensity running characteristics. Thus, endurance runners should include heavy resistance training in their training programmes to enhance endurance performance, such as improving sprinting ability at the end of a race.