Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Rapid-acting antidepressant strategies: mechanisms of action.

The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology
June 1, 2012
Blynn G Bunney et al. (2 authors)
Journal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReviewHuman Study
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to evaluate whether chronotherapeutic strategies like bright-light therapy (BLT) and sleep-phase advance (SPA) could sustain the antidepressant effects of sleep deprivation therapy (SDT).

Results Summary

The study found that BLT and SPA successfully sustained the antidepressant efficacy of SDT, suggesting these chronotherapeutic strategies can help maintain rapid improvements in depressive symptoms. It also hypothesized that such manipulations could reset abnormal circadian rhythms linked to mood disorders.

Population

Patients with severe depressive symptoms, particularly those responsive to SDT or ketamine.

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (12)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
ketamine
decrease
severe depressive symptoms
a subgroup of patients
within 48 h
produce marked improvement
#1
sleep deprivation therapy (SDT)
decrease
severe depressive symptoms
a subgroup of patients
within 48 h
produce marked improvement
#2
ketamine
decrease
depressive symptoms
over 150 patients
-
showed a rapid response
#3
Low-dose intravenous ketamine
increase
psychotomimetic effects
-
mild
produced mild psychotomimetic effects
#4
Low-dose intravenous ketamine
no change
antidepressant response
-
-
response has not been effectively sustained
#5
sleep deprivation therapy (SDT)
increase
antidepressant response
-
40-60%
response rate
#6
sleep deprivation therapy (SDT)
decrease
antidepressant efficacy
-
short
has a short duration
#7
bright-light therapy (BLT)
increase
antidepressant efficacy of SDT
-
-
successfully sustain
#8
sleep-phase advance (SPA)
increase
antidepressant efficacy of SDT
-
-
successfully sustain
#9
chronotherapeutic manipulations
increase
clock genes
-
-
can reset
#10
chronotherapeutic manipulations
decrease
abnormalities in circadian rhythms
-
-
can reset
#11
ketamine
increase
circadian rhythms
-
-
can also alter
#12
Abstract

Current antidepressants are ineffective in many depressed patients. Thus there is an urgent need to develop treatment strategies which have significantly faster response, can be sustained and have minimal side-effects. This paper reviews clinical data, potential biomarkers, mechanisms of action and future research directions for two proven strategies that produce marked improvement in severe depressive symptoms within 48 h, ketamine and sleep deprivation therapy (SDT). These treatments provide unequivocal evidence that the depressive process can be rapidly reversed in a subgroup of patients. Seventeen ketamine studies in over 150 patients showed a rapid response. Low-dose intravenous ketamine produced mild psychotomimetic effects but response has not been effectively sustained. SDT has been investigated in over 60 studies with a 40-60% response rate within 48 h. Although SDT is often used in Europe to initiate a rapid response, it is less utilized within the USA, in part, because it has a short duration when administered alone. We review data concerning chronotherapeutic strategies of bright-light therapy (BLT) and sleep-phase advance (SPA) which successfully sustain the antidepressant efficacy of SDT. Evidence is further discussed that a significant group of mood disorders have abnormal circadian rhythms which are known to be controlled by clock genes. It is hypothesized that chronotherapeutic manipulations can reset clock genes and thus, abnormalities in circadian rhythms. Further findings are reviewed that ketamine, in addition to its role as an NMDA antagonist, can also alter circadian rhythms. Thus, ketamine may share a critical mechanism with SDT.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Depressive DisorderHumansKetamineSleep DeprivationTime Factors
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy75/10
Quality80/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations55
Citations/Year4.2
Relative Citation Ratio1.81
NIH Percentile71.5%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.53
Normalized Score0.66
Related Supplements