Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Effect of calorie restriction on the free-living physical activity levels of nonobese humans: results of three randomized trials.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)
April 1, 2011
Corby K Martin et al. (8 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.Human StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The study aimed to evaluate the influence of calorie restriction (CR) on free-living physical activity levels among humans, not specifically related to Water.

Results Summary

The study found that calorie restriction led to variable decreases in activity energy expenditure (AEE), which reduced the expected rate of weight loss. Accelerometry and recall methods did not consistently detect changes in activity categories.

Population

Nonobese adults (BMI = 23.5-29.9 kg/m²) from three research centers.

Effective Dosage

Not applicable (study focused on calorie restriction, not Water).

Duration

6 to 12 months, depending on the research center.

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (12)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
25% calorie restriction (CR)
decrease
activity energy expenditure (AEE)
nonobese adults at Pennington Biomedical Research Center (PBRC)
-
larger decreases in AEE were observed
#1
low-calorie diet (LCD, 890 kcal/day supplement diet until 15% weight loss, then weight maintenance)
decrease
activity energy expenditure (AEE)
nonobese adults at Pennington Biomedical Research Center (PBRC)
-
larger decreases in AEE were observed
#2
10% calorie restriction (CR)
decrease
activity energy expenditure (AEE)
nonobese adults at Tufts University
-
significant decreases in AEE
#3
30% calorie restriction (CR)
decrease
activity energy expenditure (AEE)
nonobese adults at Tufts University
-
significant decreases in AEE
#4
20% calorie restriction (CR)
decrease
activity energy expenditure (AEE)
nonobese adults at Washington University School of Medicine (WUSM)
-
a larger decrease in AEE was observed
#5
calorie restriction (CR)
no change
activity categories
nonobese adults
-
did not consistently detect changes
#6
calorie restriction (CR)
decrease
energy deficit
nonobese adults
-
reduced the energy deficit
#7
calorie restriction (CR)
decrease
weight loss
nonobese adults
-
would reduce the expected rate
#8
accelerometry
no change
activity energy expenditure (AEE)
nonobese adults
-
did not consistently explain reduced AEE
#9
7-day recall
no change
activity energy expenditure (AEE)
nonobese adults
-
did not consistently explain reduced AEE
#10
accelerometry
decrease
sensitivity
-
-
negatively affected sensitivity
#11
7-day recall
decrease
sensitivity
-
-
negatively affected sensitivity
#12
Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of calorie restriction (CR) on free-living physical activity levels among humans. Data were from three CALERIE phase I site-specific protocols. Participants were nonobese (body mass index = 23.5-29.9 kg/m² adults randomly assigned to 25% CR, low-calorie diet (LCD, 890 kcal/day supplement diet until 15% weight loss, then weight maintenance), or control at Pennington Biomedical Research Center (PBRC); 30% or 10% CR at Tufts University; and 20% CR or control at Washington University School of Medicine (WUSM). Activity was measured at months 0, 3, and 6 (PBRC) and at months 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 (WUSM and Tufts). Total daily energy expenditure (TEE) by doubly labeled water and resting metabolic rate (RMR) were used to compute activity energy expenditure: AEE = TEE - RMR - 0.1 * TEE. Accelerometry and 7-day recall categorized activities by intensity. At Tufts, the 10% and 30% CR groups experienced significant decreases in AEE at months 6, 9, and 12. At month 6, a larger decrease in AEE was observed in the CR than the control group at WUSM. At months 3 and 6, larger decreases in AEE were observed in the CR and LCD groups than the control group at PBRC. Accelerometry and 7-day PAR did not consistently detect changes in activity categories. CR-associated changes in AEE were variable but, generally, reduced the energy deficit, which would reduce the expected rate of weight loss. Accelerometry and recall did not consistently explain reduced AEE, suggesting that increased muscle efficiency and/or decreased fidgeting accounted for decreased AEE. Inaccuracy of accelerometry and recall also likely negatively affected sensitivity.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
AdultBody CompositionBody Mass IndexBody WeightCaloric RestrictionEnergy IntakeEnergy MetabolismFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityTreatment Outcome
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations55
Citations/Year3.9
Relative Citation Ratio1.79
NIH Percentile71.1%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.38
Normalized Score0.55
Related Supplements