Panacea Index Logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Treating chronic worry: Psychological and physiological effects of a training programme based on mindfulness.

Behaviour research and therapy
September 1, 2010
Luis Carlos Delgado et al. (6 authors)
Journal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tHuman StudyClinical
Study Details

Study Goal

The researchers aimed to examine the effects of mindfulness-based training on emotional and physiological regulation in high worriers compared to progressive muscle relaxation.

Results Summary

Both groups showed similar improvements in clinical and self-reported measures, but mindfulness participants demonstrated better emotional meta-cognition and improved somatic/autonomic regulation, suggesting enhanced emotional and physiological control.

Population

36 female university students with high worry scores (Penn State Worry Questionnaire).

Effective Dosage

Not specified

Duration

Not specified

Interactions

None mentioned

Extracted Claims (8)
InterventionDirectionEndpointPopulationDosageImpactClaim #
mindfulness-based training programme
decrease
chronic worry
non-clinical high worriers
-
reduced
#1
mindfulness-based training programme
increase
emotional and physiological regulatory mechanisms
non-clinical high worriers
-
promoting
#2
mindfulness
increase
emotional meta-cognition (emotional comprehension)
female university students with high Penn State Worry Questionnaire scores
-
reported better
#3
mindfulness
increase
somatic and autonomic regulation
female university students with high Penn State Worry Questionnaire scores
-
showed improved indices of
#4
mindfulness
decrease
breathing pattern
female university students with high Penn State Worry Questionnaire scores
-
reduced
#5
mindfulness
increase
vagal reactivity during evocation of cardiac defense
female university students with high Penn State Worry Questionnaire scores
-
increased
#6
progressive muscle relaxation plus self-instruction to postpone worrying
increase
clinical and daily self-report measures
female university students with high Penn State Worry Questionnaire scores
-
showed equal post-treatment improvement in
#7
mindfulness
increase
clinical and daily self-report measures
female university students with high Penn State Worry Questionnaire scores
-
showed equal post-treatment improvement in
#8
Abstract

The present study examines psychological and physiological indices of emotional regulation in non-clinical high worriers after a mindfulness-based training programme aimed at reducing worry. Thirty-six female university students with high Penn State Worry Questionnaire scores were split into two equal intervention groups: (a) mindfulness, and (b) progressive muscle relaxation plus self-instruction to postpone worrying to a specific time of the day. Assessment included clinical questionnaires, daily self-report of number/duration of worry episodes and indices of emotional meta-cognition. A set of somatic and autonomic measures was recorded (a) during resting, mindfulness/relaxation and worrying periods, and (b) during cued and non-cued affective modulation of defence reactions (cardiac defence and eye-blink startle). Both groups showed equal post-treatment improvement in the clinical and daily self-report measures. However, mindfulness participants reported better emotional meta-cognition (emotional comprehension) and showed improved indices of somatic and autonomic regulation (reduced breathing pattern and increased vagal reactivity during evocation of cardiac defense). These findings suggest that mindfulness reduces chronic worry by promoting emotional and physiological regulatory mechanisms contrary to those maintaining chronic worry.

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Adaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAnxietyAttitudeAwarenessCognitionEmotionsFemaleHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMind-Body TherapiesRelaxation TherapyTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult
Study Links
Quality Scores
SafetyNot Assessed
Efficacy85/10
Quality75/10
Citation Metrics
Total Citations84
Citations/Year5.6
Relative Citation Ratio3.19
NIH Percentile86.2%
Research Impact Scores
APT Score0.75
Weight Score1.33
Normalized Score0.69
Related Supplements