[Comparison of standard and acupuncture methods of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis].
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of standard high-frequency TENS (ST-TENS) and acupuncture-like TENS (AL-TENS) in reducing pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Results Summary
Both ST-TENS and AL-TENS significantly reduced pain levels (48.6% and 40.8% respectively on VAS), with no statistical difference between the two methods. The hypoalgesic effect was slightly longer for AL-TENS, though not statistically significant, and side effects were negligible.
Population
33 patients (26 women, 7 men) with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis (average disease duration 10.7 years).
Effective Dosage
ST-TENS at 75 Hz and AL-TENS at 4 Hz, applied to contralateral joints.
Duration
12 days.
Interactions
None mentioned.
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
standard high frequency TENS (ST-TENS) | decrease | pain level | patients with rheumatoid arthritis | 48.6% | significant reduction | #1 |
acupuncture-like TENS (AL-TENS) | decrease | pain level | patients with rheumatoid arthritis | 40.8% | significant reduction | #2 |
standard high frequency TENS (ST-TENS) | decrease | Ritchie's index | patients with rheumatoid arthritis | P < 0.05 | significant difference | #3 |
acupuncture-like TENS (AL-TENS) | decrease | Ritchie's index | patients with rheumatoid arthritis | P < 0.05 | significant difference | #4 |
standard high frequency TENS (ST-TENS) | no change | reduction of pain level | patients with rheumatoid arthritis | - | no statistical difference | #5 |
acupuncture-like TENS (AL-TENS) | no change | reduction of pain level | patients with rheumatoid arthritis | - | no statistical difference | #6 |
standard high frequency TENS (ST-TENS) | no change | initiation of analgesic effect | patients with rheumatoid arthritis | - | no statistical difference | #7 |
acupuncture-like TENS (AL-TENS) | no change | initiation of analgesic effect | patients with rheumatoid arthritis | - | no statistical difference | #8 |
acupuncture-like TENS (AL-TENS) | increase | hypoalgesic effect | patients with rheumatoid arthritis | statistically not significant | slightly longer | #9 |
standard high frequency TENS (ST-TENS) | no change | patients' global assessment | patients with rheumatoid arthritis | - | did not differ | #10 |
acupuncture-like TENS (AL-TENS) | no change | patients' global assessment | patients with rheumatoid arthritis | - | did not differ | #11 |
standard high frequency TENS (ST-TENS) | no change | opinion on possible dosage reduction of analgetics/antirheumatics | patients with rheumatoid arthritis | - | did not differ | #12 |
acupuncture-like TENS (AL-TENS) | no change | opinion on possible dosage reduction of analgetics/antirheumatics | patients with rheumatoid arthritis | - | did not differ | #13 |
standard high frequency TENS (ST-TENS) | no change | side effects | patients with rheumatoid arthritis | - | negligible | #14 |
acupuncture-like TENS (AL-TENS) | no change | side effects | patients with rheumatoid arthritis | - | negligible | #15 |
standard high frequency TENS (ST-TENS) | increase | hypoalgesic effect | patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis | - | provided hypoalgesic effect in the similar degree | #16 |
acupuncture-like TENS (AL-TENS) | increase | hypoalgesic effect | patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis | - | provided hypoalgesic effect in the similar degree | #17 |
The comparison of standard high frequency (ST-TENS) and acupuncture-like TENS (AL-TENS) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is presented. Thirty-three patients (26 women and 7 men) with rheumatoid arthritis (according to modified ACR criteria), and with the duration of the disease 10.7 +/- 8.8 years are investigated. Each subject received ST-TENS (75 Hz) at the selected joint and AL-TENS (4 Hz) at the contralateral joint respectively. No significant difference between left and right side in pre-treatment pain was the main criterion for selecting the treated joint. Treatment was performed during 12 days. The initiation, duration, level of hypolgesia (according to Ritchie's pain assessment scale and VAS), patients' global assessment and possible reduction of dosage of analgetics/antirheumatics were measured. There was a significant reduction in pain level on ST-TENS site (48.6%), and on AL-TENS site (40.8%), measured on VAS. Results of Ritchie's index showed significant difference before and after application (for each type of TENS P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between both types of TENS regarding the reduction of pain level, as well as the initiation of analgesic effect, whilst it was noted a slightly longer, although statistically not significant, hypoalgesic effect of AL-TENS. Patients' global assessment also did not differ relating to ST-TENS and AL-TENS, as well as their opinion on possible dosage reduction of analgetics/antirheumatics. Side effects for both types of TENS were negligible. The findings showed that ST-TENS and AL-TENS provided hypoalgesic effect in the similar degree in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis.