Creatine and beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) additively increase lean body mass and muscle strength during a weight-training program.
Study Goal
The researchers aimed to determine whether HMB and creatine act via similar or different mechanisms to increase lean body mass and strength in humans undergoing resistance training.
Results Summary
HMB supplementation (3.0 g/day) led to a modest increase in lean body mass (0.39 kg over placebo) and strength (37.5 kg cumulative increase), with a nitrogen-sparing effect and suppression of exercise-induced serum creatine phosphokinase rise. The effects of HMB and creatine were additive, suggesting different mechanisms.
Population
40 subjects undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training (HMB group: n = 9).
Effective Dosage
3.0 g of HMB per day.
Duration
3 weeks.
Interactions
Creatine supplementation antagonized HMB's effect on serum creatine phosphokinase.
| Intervention | Direction | Endpoint | Population | Dosage | Impact | Claim # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
creatine (CR) | increase | lean body mass (LBM) | humans undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training | 0.92 kg over the placebo group | gained | #1 |
beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) | increase | lean body mass (LBM) | humans undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training | 0.39 kg over the placebo group | gained | #2 |
CR-and-HMB (CR/HMB) | increase | lean body mass (LBM) | humans undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training | 1.54 kg over the placebo group | gained | #3 |
CR supplementation | increase | lean body mass (LBM) | humans undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training | - | significant effect | #4 |
HMB supplementation | increase | lean body mass (LBM) | humans undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training | - | trend | #5 |
HMB supplementation | increase | strength | humans undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training | 37.5 kg above the placebo group | caused accumulative strength increases | #6 |
CR supplementation | increase | strength | humans undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training | 39.1 kg above the placebo group | caused accumulative strength increases | #7 |
CR/HMB supplementation | increase | strength | humans undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training | 51.9 kg above the placebo group | caused accumulative strength increases | #8 |
HMB supplementation | decrease | exercise-induced rise in serum creatine phosphokinase | humans undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training | - | markedly suppressed | #9 |
CR supplementation | neutral | serum creatine phosphokinase | humans undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training | - | antagonized the HMB effects | #10 |
CR supplementation | no change | urine urea nitrogen | humans undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training | - | not affected | #11 |
CR supplementation | no change | plasma urea | humans undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training | - | not affected | #12 |
HMB supplementation | decrease | urine urea nitrogen | humans undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training | - | decreased | #13 |
HMB supplementation | decrease | plasma urea | humans undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training | - | decreased | #14 |
We investigated whether creatine (CR) and beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) act by similar or different mechanisms to increase lean body mass (LBM) and strength in humans undergoing progressive resistance-exercise training. In this double-blind, 3-wk study, subjects (n = 40) were randomized to placebo (PL; n = 10), CR (20.0 g of CR/d for 7 d followed by 10.0 g of CR/d for 14 d; n = 11), HMB (3.0 g of HMB/d; n = 9), or CR-and-HMB (CR/HMB; n = 10) treatment groups. Over 3 wk, all subjects gained LBM, which was assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis. The CR, HMB and CR/HMB groups gained 0.92, 0.39, and 1.54 kg of LBM, respectively, over the placebo group, with a significant effect with CR supplementation (main effect P = 0.05) and a trend with HMB supplementation (main effect P = 0.08). These effects were additive because there was no interaction between CR and HMB (CR x HMB main effect P = 0.73). Across all exercises, HMB, CR, and CR/HMB supplementation caused accumulative strength increases of 37.5, 39.1, and 51.9 kg, respectively, above the placebo group. The exercise-induced rise in serum creatine phosphokinase was markedly suppressed with HMB supplementation (main effect P = 0.01). However, CR supplementation antagonized the HMB effects on serum creatine phosphokinase (CR x HMB interactive effect P = 0.04). Urine urea nitrogen and plasma urea were not affected by CR supplementation, but both decreased with HMB supplementation (HMB effect P < 0.05), suggesting a nitrogen-sparing effect. In summary, CR and HMB can increase LBM and strength, and the effects are additive. Although not definitive, these results suggest that CR and HMB act by different mechanisms.